Leading and Managing Innovation Evaluate

Question: Discuss about the Leading and Managing Innovation Evaluate. Answer: Introduction The aim of this document is to critically evaluate and analyze the selected business case Sharing Better Practice with better overview. The critical analysis is performed to identify possible alternatives available for the selected business case. Moreover, the critical analysis aims to evaluate the alternative options regarding the benefits, costs, and risks aspects. After these aspects consideration, this document provides a preferred solution over the business case (Bresnen 2016). In order to analyze the above-mentioned points, the essay considers some methods such as need analysis, cause-effect analysis, and cost-benefit analysis to emphasize over the effectiveness of the business case. The first phase of the Sharing Better Practice project is initiated in October 2003 approved by the Steering Committee (Newman 2016; Archibald Archibald 2016). In this business case, the second phase is demonstrated based on outputs of first phase. In first phase, the definition of good practice is depicted as to capture and share better ideas for improving the business requirements and entire work process. Business Case Critical Analysis The project initiated with Department of Premier and Cabinets draft Corporate Plan 2002-2005 for identification of major addressed issues from IAPPU in the year span 2003 to 2004 (Turner 2016). The issues included facilitation of good practices and development of an appropriate methodology to support significant Government information management and systems activities. As the good practice definition is stated as the capture, sharing and subsequent implementation of good ideas i.e. innovations or lessons learnt about what works and what does not in Government business activities. This is aimed at improving the way we do business both in terms of effectiveness and efficiency (Kuryl 2004). The second phase business plan is prepared for establishing appropriate business process structure within IAPPU and in other agencies (Mazzei, Flynn Haynie 2016). This plan is incorporated with detailed implementation planning as well. Business Case Problem Statement First phase of Sharing Better Practice business case stated problem statement as to facilitate better ideas and concepts to address better effectiveness in business processes. Currently, in business processes such as project, systems and information management, lack of new ideas and better practice issue persists. Hence, this project is considered to put on improvements regarding the efficiency in process implementation. Therefore, the identified outcomes from this project are following: Possible Alternatives In this business case, possible alternatives are identified in form of some projects that are reliant over second phase. The capturing and sharing of better practice information undertaken by IAAPU staffs with their responsibilities. The related alternatives are: These identified alternative projects that can be utilized in the current scenario for improvement of the information sharing over new ideas and practice concepts. Moreover, the alternatives are addressed for evaluating the cost, benefits, and risks. Further, the financial summary is presented to emphasize over the policy, guidelines, and project unit cost assessment. This project business case is demonstrated with rationale of the preferred solution to identify why preferences are placed. Evaluation of the Benefit, Cost and Risk of Alternative Options For better financial support, internal capital will be supplied from Inter Agency Policy and Projects Unit, Department of Premier and Cabinet. Risks are addressed with Tasmanian Government Project management guidelines (Silvius 2016; Wittmayer Loorbach 2016). In first phase of the project, the risks are included as following: Strong reliance over capturing information concerning good practices in Tasmanian Government agencies guidelines Several obstacles and hindrances over good practice information sharing within government agencies Reluctance over implementation of agreed practices for business units Stakeholders aiming for identification of existing poor areas where practices are not utilized In aspects of these risks, the business case provided some mitigation strategies; the strategies are relevant in those aspects. Moreover, the business case should identify those risks in terms of likelihood, severity, and impact; so that risks can be prioritized for elimination (Ben Mahmoud?Jouini, Midler Silberzahn 2016). In current second phase business case, the risks are mitigated taking all of them catastrophic or major. Risk assessment and management is considered as major activity in business planning with initiatives of examining the risk register and contingency planning. Risk status is used in risk register for reporting to the Steering Committee with status incorporation (Binder 2016). Issues register is another method that was included in quality management and risk management planning with regular frequency. Quality management planning is prepared taking Project Management Methodology, Output Development Methodology, output quality, performance measures, and standards. Reporting, monitoring, assessment, and risk registers are adhered in this planning with information management (Lee 2016; Yahiaoui, Chebbi Weber 2016). Quality management planning should be conducted with procurement planning as well. Procurement of quality ensures assessment of quality in terms of improving further processes as well. Project management methodology is mentioned in the project as Tasmanian Government Project guidelines version 5.0; the business case is relevant as the guideline is specific for application (Rekonen Bjorklund 2016). Again, output development methodology is mentioned to be following project management information and resources project (PMIRP). For appropriate output quality, the project is designed to incorporate IASC, IAPPU, and management groups in consultancy with purpose of initial outpu ts (Pugh 2016; Qin Chen 2016). Focus groups are important for appropriate demonstration of new ideas and practice in project. Performance measures should be estimated based on key performance indicators in project standards and completion constraints. Moreover, the performance measures that are selected as baseline data, outcome realization plan and existing performance measurement factors (Coates 2016). Successful and fulfilling project business case should include appropriate standards, in this business plan; Tasmanian Government Web Publishing Standards are employed with information and resources. Along with standards, the reporting requirements are considered in the project for better progress reports and outcomes listing. The project development planning is prepared with appropriate schedules along with timeline for first phase project execution. The schedule is presented with detailed milestones and activities (Bresnen 2016). However, the scheduling should be prepared with suitable duration setting for specifically identifying the duration of the entire project and appropriate completion time. Therefore, the outcome realization planning is prepared for progressive management for IAPPU. Above-mentioned governance model is essential for monitoring and assessing the project activities with quality management planning. Monitoring employs regular or frequent revision of progress reports for adoption of changes in planning (Newman 2016). As per necessary data and information management, the TRIM file system is used in the project. Moreover, outcome realization planning is prepared in the business case for designated and ongoing management process with reporting certain achievement (Archibald Archibald 2016). The outcome realization planning is quite similar to post-implementation reviewing procedure for most projects. Rationale of the Preferred Solution Rationale of the preferred solution suggests the major points that can be considered in the project as scope of work, communication tools, stakeholder management planning, and project management planning as well. Second phase of the project includes scope of the work in terms of in-scope, out-of-scope, and uncertain or unresolved work (Turner 2016; Mazzei, Flynn Haynie 2016). In-scope work is included in business plan showing important and appropriate activities in the project. Implementation of essential business process is important in the project for supporting better practices in system. However, the architectural principles will not be accepted as in-scope project work (Silvius 2016). On the other hand, the communication should be aimed at establishment of IAPPU for central driver to support better practices. Quality management process is readied taking Project Management Methodology, Output Development Methodology, outcome quality, execution measures, and models. Reporting, observing, appraisal, and hazard registers are followed in this arranging with data administration (Wittmayer Loorbach 2016; Ben Mahmoud?Jouini, Midler Silberzahn 2016). Quality administration arranging ought to be directed with acquisition arranging too. Obtainment of value guarantees evaluation of value as far as enhancing further procedures too. Project administration strategy is said in the project as Tasmanian Government Project guidelines; the business case is important, as the strategy is particular for application (Binder 2016). Once more, yield improvement procedure is said to take after project administration data and assets extend (PMIRP). For fitting yield quality, the project is intended to join IASC, IAPPU, and administration assembles in consultancy with reason for beginning yields (Lee 2016). In addi tion, the execution measures that are chosen as gauge information, result acknowledgment arrange and existing execution estimation elements (Yahiaoui, Chebbi Weber 2016). Fruitful and satisfying project business case ought to incorporate suitable norms, in this strategy for success; Tasmanian Government Web Publishing Standards are utilized with data and assets. The project improvement arranging is set up with suitable timetables alongside course of events for first stage extends execution. The timetable is given significant turning points and exercises (Rekonen Bjorklund 2016). In spite of, the booking ought to be set up with reasonable length setting for particularly recognizing the term of the whole project and suitable consummation time. Monitoring includes regular or frequent changes of progress reports for adoption of changes in planning (Pugh 2016). According to vital information and data administration, the TRIM record framework is utilized as a part of the project. Additionally, result acknowledgment arranging is set up in the business case for assigned and progressing administration handle with reporting certain accomplishment (Qin Chen 2016; Coates 2016). The result acknowledgment arranging is very like post-execution exploring method for generally extends. Chance appraisal and administration is considered as significant movemen t in business arranging with activities of inspecting the hazard enlist and possibility arranging. Progress and project status is utilized as a part of risk register for answering to the Steering Committee with status joining (Yahiaoui, Chebbi Weber 2016). Risk Register is another strategy that was incorporated into quality administration and hazard administration arranging with standard recurrence. Conclusion Meetings with project stakeholder are essential for proper exhibit of new thoughts and practice in project. Execution measures ought to be evaluated in light of key execution markers in project gauges and finishing imperatives. Alongside models, the reporting prerequisites are considered in the project for better advance reports and results posting. Along these lines, the result acknowledgment arranging is set up for dynamic administration for IAPPU. The project is conducted to improve the information sharing and capturing in form of ideas realization and implementation in appropriate manner. The project requires benefit planning to continue the analysis process aligned with resource utilization. Major limitation in the business case is identified as period estimation without duration identification. Most of the project fails due to unidentified duration of activities; the activities tend to take more lengthy duration than usual making entire project longer than planned. In this long er schedule, the project takes expenditure more than planned value in the project causing significant adjustments in the budget. Therefore, the recommended steps should be incorporated as; To include durations for the activities in the entire project To add essential severity and impact in risk identification process To assess risks based on scoring of consequences and impact on project References Archibald, R.D. Archibald, S., 2016.Leading Managing Innovation: What Every Executive Team Must Know about Project, Program, Portfolio Management(Vol. 22). CRC Press. Ben Mahmoud?Jouini, S., Midler, C. Silberzahn, P., 2016. Contributions of Design Thinking to Project Management in an Innovation Context.Project Management Journal,47(2), pp.144-156. Binder, J., 2016.Global project management: communication, collaboration management across borders. CRC Press. Bresnen, M., 2016. Institutional development, divergence change in the discipline of project management.International Journal of Project Management,34(2), pp.328-338. Coates, H.L., 2016. Training researchers how to manage data to produce better results, enable reuse, provide for long-term access. Kuryl, K., 2004. Sharing Better Practice Project Business Plan Phase 2: Inter Agency Policy Projects Unit, DEPARTMENT OF PREMIER CABINET. Lee, M.C., 2016. Knowledge management innovation management: best practices in knowledge sharing knowledge value chain.International Journal of Innovation Learning,19(2), pp.206-226. Mazzei, M.J., Flynn, C.B. Haynie, J.J., 2016. Moving beyond initial success: Promoting innovation in small businesses through high-performance work practices.Business Horizons,59(1), pp.51-60. Newman, V., 2016. Mapping Innovation Practice Among Practitioners.InImpact: The Journal of Innovation Impact,7(1), p.1. Pugh, L., 2016.Change management in information services. Routledge. Qin, F. Chen, P., 2016. Knowledge Management of Project Team Based on Life Cycle Theory. InProceedings of the 6th International Asia Conference on Industrial Engineering Management Innovation(pp. 645-652). Atlantis Press. Rekonen, S. Bjorklund, T.A., 2016. Adapting to the changing needs of managing innovative projects.European Journal of Innovation Management,19(1), pp.111-132. Silvius, A.J.G., 2016. Strategic Integration of Social Media into Project Management Practice. Turner, R., 2016.Gower handbook of project management. Routledge. Wittmayer, J.M. Loorbach, D., 2016. Governing Transitions in Cities: Fostering Alternative Ideas, Practices, Social Relations Through Transition Management. InGovernance of Urban Sustainability Transitions(pp. 13-32). Springer Japan. Yahiaoui, D., Chebbi, H. Weber, Y., 2016. HR practices, context knowledge transfer in MA.The International Journal of Human Resource Management,27(20), pp.2415-2435.